Scientific Realism, Scientific Practice, and Science Communication: An Empirical Investigation of Academics and Science Communicators

We argue that the societal consequences of the scientific realism debate, in the context of science-to-public communication are often overlooked and careful
theorizing about it needs further empirical groundwork. As such, we conducted a survey experiment with 130 academics (from physics, chemistry, and biology) and
137 science communicators. We provided them with an 11-item questionnaire probing their views of scientific realism and related concepts. Contra theoretical
expectations, we find that (a) science communicators are generally more inclined towards scientific antirealism when compared to scientists in the same academic
fields, though both groups show an inclination towards realism and (b) academics who engage in more theoretical work are not less (or more) realist than experimentalists. Lastly, (c), we fail to find differences with respect to selective realism but find that science communicators are significantly less epistemically
voluntarist compared to their academic counterparts. Overall, our results provide first empirical evidence on the views of scientists and science communicators on
scientific realism, with some results running contra to the theoretical expectations, opening up new empirical and theoretical research directions.