Abstract
There are various categorization models of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in the literature that need to be more consistent in definition, terminology, and concept completeness. In this review, we present a training goal-oriented categorization model of HIIT, aiming to find the best possible consensus among the various defined types of HIIT. This categorization concludes with six different types of HIIT derived from the literature, based on the interaction of interval duration, interval intensity and interval:recovery ratio. We discuss the science behind the defined types of HIIT and shed light on the possible effects of the various types of HIIT on aerobic, anaerobic, and neuromuscular systems and possible transfer effects into competition performance. We highlight various research gaps, discrepancies in findings and not yet proved know-how based on a lack of randomized controlled training studies, especially in well-trained to elite athlete cohorts. Our HIIT “toolbox” approach is designed to guide goal-oriented training. It is intended to lay the groundwork for future systematic reviews and serves as foundation for meta-analyses.</jats:p>
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 1414307 |
Journal | Frontiers in Physiology |
Volume | 15 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 18 Jun 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:Copyright © 2024 Stöggl, Strepp, Wiesinger and Haller.
Keywords
- aerobic and anaerobic energy contribution
- endurance performance
- neuromuscular
- speed endurance training
- sprint
Fields of Science and Technology Classification 2012
- 509 Other Social Sciences
- 106 Biology