Austria – a Strong Start Followed by a Strong Descent

Franz Fallend, Eric Miklin*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding/Legal commentaryChapter in BookResearch

Abstract

Austria traditionally is a federal consensus democracy with many formal and informal veto-players. Its handling of the Covid-19 pandemic between February 2020 and May 2021 provides evidence of advantages as well as disadvantages of such systems. As long as actors on all levels held similar views on how to proceed and put cooperation before contestation and electoral considerations, reactions to combat the virus were very effective and met with the broad support of the opposition, regional governments, and citizens. Austria quickly introduced social-distancing measures, accompanied by generous financial programs to offset negative effects on the economy. Following established patterns of policy-making, government assumed the leading role, while corporatist actors were involved in the negotiation and implementation of the measures. As a result, the spread of Covid-19 remained low. Once policy differences between political actors increased and significant parts of the public became critical toward strict containment measures, cooperation was replaced by contestation. Austria still managed to avoid a medical disaster. However, government actions now became much less decisive and effective.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationGovernments' Responses to the Covid-19 Pandemic in Europe
Subtitle of host publicationNavigating the Perfect Storm
EditorsKennet Lynggaard, Mads Dagnis Jensen, Michael Kluth
Place of PublicationCham, Switzerland
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Chapter33
Pages397-407
Number of pages11
ISBN (Print)9783031141447
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Publication series

NameGovernments' Responses to the Covid-19 Pandemic in Europe

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023.

Fields of Science and Technology Classification 2012

  • 506 Political Science

Cite this