Collective action control: Ubiquitous processes and cultural differences

J. Lukas Thürmer*, Kaiyuan Chen, Sean M. McCrea

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Humans have two superpowers: reaching desired end-states (goals) and working together (cooperation). We conceptualize these two capabilities as one: collective action control. We discuss ubiquitous processes and (potential) cultural differences in collective action control in the context of two established frameworks—social identity and norms—as well as an emerging attribution of intent perspective. We illustrate collective action control processes by discussing responses to critical feedback during goal pursuit, as exemplified in research on the rejection of intergroup criticism (Intergroup Sensitivity Effect). Established frameworks did not predict the pattern of current empirical observations. We therefore call for developing the attribution of intent account through systematic theory building and research to identify the ubiquitous and culture-specific processes of collective action control.
Original languageEnglish
Article number101904
Number of pages7
JournalCurrent Opinion in Psychology
Volume60
Early online date18 Sept 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2024

Keywords

  • collective action control
  • social identity
  • norm violations
  • attribution of intent
  • culture
  • individualism
  • collectivism
  • honor

Fields of Science and Technology Classification 2012

  • 501 Psychology

Cite this