Mechanisms of emotional eating and drinking: Sadness increases approach bias and craving for chocolate and alcohol

Hannah van Alebeek*, Sercan Kahveci, Reinout W. Wiers, Jens Blechert

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Negative affect can trigger overconsumption of appetitive substances, but specific mechanisms and trait-level risk factors remain unclear. In two pre-registered studies, we tested whether negative affect increases approach bias and craving for chocolate and alcohol, with strongest effects expected in individuals with self-reported emotional intake.
In Study 1 (N = 87), negative or neutral affect was induced on separate days, followed by an approach-avoidance-task and craving ratings. Study 2 employed a more potent affect induction and larger sample (N = 132).
In Study 1, affect induction failed, so we analyzed incidental variations in self-reported sadness. Approach biases and cravings to chocolate and alcohol were stronger during sessions with higher sadness. Study 2 replicated and extended this finding by showing that induced negative affect increased biases and cravings. Further, trait emotional eaters showed a stronger affect-related increase in chocolate bias, while trait emotional drinkers exhibited stronger biases independent of affect.
Craving and approach bias increases help explain why self-regulation may fail under emotional distress. Consistent findings for chocolate and alcohol suggests their potential generalizability across appetitive substances. Trait questionnaires can be regarded as risk indicators, offering a basis for tailored interventions by identifying who is vulnerable to overconsumption and when.
Original languageEnglish
Article number113333
Number of pages14
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume246
Early online date23 Jun 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2025

Keywords

  • Approach bias
  • Craving
  • Alcohol
  • Emotional eating
  • Emotional drinking

Fields of Science and Technology Classification 2012

  • 501 Psychology

Cite this