Meditation, Not Information? A Survey Experiment Probing the Effects of Meditation Practice on Affective Polarization and Pro-Environmentalism

Lena Ramstetter, Johannes Klackl*, Eva Jonas, Gabriele Spilker

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives
Climate change is one of the most pressing issues of our time. However, current policies are insufficient to keep climate change at manageable levels. In the United States, this is partly because attitudes and opinions on climate change have become increasingly divided along political party lines, making effective policymaking difficult. The existing literature has focused chiefly on cognitive (i.e., informational) approaches to increasing climate change awareness, which are often counterproductive due to patterns of biased information processing. We examined whether meditation can reduce affective polarization and the partisan divide on climate change.

Method
Using a preregistered survey experiment with 500 US respondents, we investigated whether a short (10-min) meditation practice would render partisans less polarized and more pro-environmental. Participants completed either a mindfulness meditation practice designed to cultivate awareness of thoughts and sensations, a loving-kindness meditation practice designed to cultivate unconditional love and compassion, or no meditation.

Results
Self-identified Republicans who completed the loving-kindness meditation subsequently reported significantly lower polarization scores compared to Republicans who did not meditate. Surprisingly, self-identified Democrats who completed the mindfulness meditation exhibited higher anthropocentrism than Democrats who did not meditate. This suggests that mindfulness meditation may, in some cases, reduce some aspects of pro-environmentalism.

Conclusions
Our results suggest that a short loving-kindness meditation can reduce polarization among Republicans. A form of mindfulness that cultivates awareness of thoughts and sensations but not interpersonal connectedness can have unintended side effects by fostering an anthropocentric worldview among Democrats.

Preregistration
This study was preregistered (https://osf.io/nza78).
Original languageEnglish
Article number103263
Pages (from-to)507–524
Number of pages18
JournalMindfulness
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Feb 2025

Keywords

  • Mindfulness
  • Political polarization
  • Affective polarization
  • Climate change

Fields of Science and Technology Classification 2012

  • 501 Psychology

Cite this