Neural speech tracking benefit of lip movements predicts behavioral deterioration when the speaker's mouth is occluded

Patrick Reisinger*, Marlies Gillis, Nina Süß, Jonas Vanthornhout, Chandra Leon Haider, Thomas Hartmann, Anne Hauswald, Konrad Schwarz, Tom Francart, Nathan Weisz

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Working paper/PreprintPreprint

Abstract

Observing lip movements of a speaker is known to facilitate speech understanding, especially in challenging listening situations. Converging evidence from neuroscientific studies shows enhanced processing of audiovisual stimuli. However, the interindividual variability of this visual benefit and its consequences on behavior are unknown. Here, we analyzed source-localized magnetoencephalographic (MEG) responses from normal-hearing participants listening to audiovisual speech with or without an additional distractor speaker. Using temporal response functions (TRFs), we show that neural responses to lip movements are, in general, enhanced when speech is challenging. After conducting a crucial control for speech acoustics, we show that lip movements effectively contribute to higher neural speech tracking, particularly when a distractor speaker is present. However, the extent of this visual benefit varied greatly among participants. Probing the behavioral relevance, we show that individuals who benefit more from lip movement information in terms of neural speech tracking, show a stronger drop in performance and an increase in perceived difficulty when the mouth is occluded by a surgical face mask. By contrast, no effect was found when the mouth was not occluded. We provide novel insights on how the benefit of lip movements in terms of neural speech tracking varies among individuals. Furthermore, we reveal its behavioral relevance by demonstrating negative consequences for behavior when visual speech is absent. Our results also offer potential implications for future objective assessments of audiovisual speech perception.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherbioRxiv
Number of pages46
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Apr 2023

Fields of Science and Technology Classification 2012

  • 501 Psychology

Cite this