Suitability of specific soft tissue swabs for the forensic identification of highly decomposed bodies

Katharina Helm, Christian Matzenauer, Franz Neuhuber, Fabio Carlo Monticelli, Harald Meyer, Stefan Pittner, Walther Gotsmy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

When decomposition of a recovered body is fairly advanced, identification based on common morphologic features is often impossible. In these cases, short tandem repeat (STR) marker genotyping has established itself as a convenient and reliable alternative. However, at very progressed stages of decomposition, postmortem tissue putrefaction processes can decrease DNA yields considerably. Hence, not all types of tissue are equally suitable for successful STR marker-based postmortem identification.
Bone or dental material is often analysed in corpses with advanced decompositional changes. However, processing of these materials is very elaborate and time and resource consuming. We have therefore focused on the suitableness of various types of soft tissue swabs, where DNA extraction is easier and faster. By sampling 28 bodies at various stages of decomposition, we evaluated the suitability of different tissues for genotyping at varying degrees of physical decay. This was achieved by a systematic classification of the sampled bodies by morphological scoring and subsequent analysis of multiple tissue swabs of the aortic wall, urinary bladder wall, brain, liver, oral mucosa and skeletal muscle.
In summary, we found variable degrees of suitability of different types of soft tissue swabs for DNA-based identification. Swabs of the aortic wall, the urinary bladder wall and brain tissue yielded the best results — in descending order — even at advanced levels of decay.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1319 - 1327
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Legal Medicine
Volume135
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • Forensic identification
  • Decomposition
  • Soft tissues
  • DNA profiling
  • STR marker

Fields of Science and Technology Classification 2012

  • 106 Biology
  • 305 Other Human Medicine, Health Sciences

Cite this